It's easy to prove that the inverse of a continuous bijection is continuous—basically, "because is monotone." Proving the same for the inverse of a continuous bijection is quite a bit harder.
What are some general situations where it's easy prove that a continuous bijection has a continuous inverse? The following is probably my favorite short result from point-set topology.
Proposition: A continuous map from a compact space to a Hausdorff space is closed.
The proof is just a collection of definitions: a closed set in a compact space is compact, the continuous image of a compact set is compact, and a compact set in a Hausdorff space is closed. However, this is enough to prove that a continuous bijection from a compact space to a Hausdorff space is a homeomorphism.
What if our domain is not compact? Can we use the compact-to-Hausdorff idea to get anything for free? I was thinking about this today and came up with the following.
Proposition. A continuous, proper (preimage of compacts are compact) bijection from anything into a locally compact Hausdorff space is a homeomorphism.
Proof. Let be our map. Proving that is continuous is the same as proving that is closed. If is compact then we're done by the above. Otherwise, lift to a map between Alexandroff extensions, defining . (We take , with the additional open sets for all open such that is compact.)
We need three facts about the Alexandroff extension.
The lift is continuous exactly when is proper. (Basically by definition.)
is compact. (This doesn't depend on anything—the Alexandroff extension is always compact, essentially by definition.)
is Hausdorff. (This relies both on being locally compact and Hausdorff to guarantee that any point can be separated from .)
Now the proof is easy—again a collection of definitions.
Let be a closed set in . Suppose that it was not previously compact. It extends to a compact set in . Since is proper, is continuous and is compact in . Since is Hausdorff, is closed, and hence is closed relative to . □